Icono-Clan
Connecting the Icono-Clan: Memory, History, Desire
We know that dance emerges from these spaces. What we remember
- or what we want to remember - becomes the fertile ground where
a dance and its performance grow. A fleeting gesture, a smell that
awakens a sensation long forgotten, a melody half-heard - any of
these can spark a creative exploration that becomes dance theater.
Or maybe dance starts from what we want to forget. Many contemporary
dance mavericks have grown by rejecting the work of their teachers
and mentors. Martha Graham rejected the orientalist dances
of Ruth St. Denis; Cunningham, who danced for Graham, grew weary
of her caped goddesses and repressed Puritan women. Cunningham,
who came of creative age in the socially prescribed America of
the 1950s, masked his deepest desires in dances that stressed abstraction
over personal interaction. Maybe he wanted to forget the bases of
human folly that form the core of Graham’s oeuvre. After
all, Graham made dance theater that told of the human psyche.
Cunningham moved in a different direction, toward the things he
liked about dancing: shape, line, mathematical possibilities.
Gus Solomons, who continues to work as a dance critic and performer
as well as choreographer, surely values histories of dance and the
memories that feed its recounting. He also understands the caprice
that often leads to choreography: he’s staged works that responded
to the real-time sounds of the audience in a darkened theater, or
the presence of books in an architecture library at his alma mater
MIT, or tasks written on cards handed to performers as they enter
the performance space. As an artist, Solomons wonders what
happens when things get changed unexpectedly, and memory opens itself
to unprecedented future possibilities.
For years, Donald Byrd has tracked the landscapes of human desire
as a personal, intellectual, and social capacity in his choreography.
His works explore how people *need* in their individual movements,
through dance theater that asks questions of how groups of people
need each other.. For Byrd, the desire to achieve excellence in
performance - persistently defined by clarity and fullness
of execution, aligned with an emotional transparency - becomes a
call to imagine productive social interactions. Byrd proposes that
we want to forget our ambitions, or what we’ve done, at times,
when those memories seem less than flattering. But what we
want and what we need are not necessarily the same thing; Byrd’s
choreography repeatedly engages this truth.
How are these three artists aligned? Obviously in the pervasive
interest in movement abstraction; the ways in which physicality
is often treated like architecture. But they are also aligned
personally: Solomons danced for Cunningham; Byrd danced for
Solomons; Solomons danced for Byrd; Byrd remembers, potently, how
Cunningham danced. And on and on, as history, memory, and desire
always seem to arrive in dance. Surely this unprecedented program
answers Spectrum Artistic Director Byrd’s memory of Cunningham’s
choreographic work in need of reconstruction. It answers his knowledge
of the genealogies of artists whose histories overlap. And it answers
an abiding desire to have us all savor connections in these works
of three American iconoclasts.
Tickets
1. online at www.stgpresents.org,
2. by phone at (877)STG-4TIX
3. at The Paramount Theatre box office, Monday through Friday 10:00am-6:00pm
4. and at The Moore Theatre box office Tuesday through Friday 11:00am-2:30pm and 3:15pm-6:00pm or at venue kiosks.
The Moore Theatre is located at 1932 Second Avenue in downtown Seattle.
Silk Road
Dinner • Silent & Live Auction • Entertainment
March 27th, 2010
5:30pm Western Time
NEW: Donald Byrd Blog Click here to view blog

PH 206.325.4161 | F 206.325.3056 | E staff@spectrumdance.org

